MoltSearch.
Multiple AIs debate.
One answer you can trust.
You asked an AI something that mattered — and then wondered whether it was true. MoltSearch sends your question to up to ten of the best-known AI models at once, and each one answers on its own — none of them can see the others. Then they rank each other’s answers with the names hidden, a neutral judge writes the one answer you get, and it arrives with links you can click and a score showing how much the AIs actually agreed.
What it does.
Up to ten AIs answer at once.
Your question goes to up to ten of the best-known models — ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, Grok, DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen, Kimi and MiniMax. Each one answers on its own. None of them can see what the others wrote, so one model’s mistake can’t spread into the other answers.
Then they rank each other’s answers.
Every model reads the other answers and puts them in order, best to worst. The names are taken off first, so no model knows who wrote what. It can’t vote for itself, or for a brand it recognises.
A neutral judge writes the final answer.
A separate AI reads every answer and every ranking, then writes the one answer you see. It never answers your question itself, so it has no answer of its own to defend — a referee, not a player. In the app it’s called the chairman.
The agreement score is measured, not guessed.
We compare the answers against each other and work out how close they really are. The number you see is that measurement. No AI is asked how confident it feels.
It tells you when the AIs disagree.
When the models genuinely disagree, the answer says so instead of picking a side and sounding sure. If the score can’t be worked out, it reports that it couldn’t be measured rather than making a number up. Knowing there is no settled answer is often the useful part.
Every fact comes with a link.
Facts are backed by live web results, linked right inside the answer. Tap one and read the original yourself. You never have to take our word for it.
You don’t have to pick the best AI.
New models arrive every month and the leader keeps changing. You shouldn’t have to follow any of that. Ask once, and the panel covers it for you.
Live Debate Feed.
Trending questions get debated on their own as news breaks — finance, technology, business, world, health, sport and entertainment — refreshed every six hours. Each one arrives complete: the final answer, the ranking and the sources. Every debate has its own link, so you can send someone exactly what you saw.
Ask however you like.
Type it, say it out loud, or send a screenshot and it pulls the text out. You can ask as a role too — developer, doctor, lawyer, chef, financial advisor. Web, iPhone and Android, 11 languages, light or dark, with your full history there to reopen.
How it works.
Start with the problem. You ask a chatbot something and get one confident answer back. There is no way to tell, from the answer alone, whether it is right. The AI writing it is also the only thing checking it — and from the inside, a made-up fact looks exactly like a real one.
MoltSearch changes the setup. Step one: your question goes to the panel — up to ten leading AI models at the same time. Each one answers on its own, and no model can see what any other model wrote, so one model’s mistake can’t spread into the other answers. Step two: each model then reads the other answers and ranks them, with the names stripped out. No model knows who wrote what, so it can’t vote for itself or for a brand it recognises.
Step three: a separate AI — the one the app calls the chairman — reads every answer and every ranking, then writes the single answer you get. It never answers your question itself, so it has nothing of its own to defend. Two things come back with that answer. Sources: the facts are pulled from live web results and linked in the answer, so you can click through and check them yourself. And an agreement score: we measure how close the answers really were. If they lined up, that is worth knowing. If they disagree, MoltSearch says so — and if the score can’t be worked out, it reports that instead of inventing a number.
Ten AIs can still be wrong. But ten of them making the same mistake on the same question is far less likely than one. Web search fixes out-of-date facts; it doesn’t fix bad reasoning. A second opinion does. You also stop having to track which model is best this month — ask once, and the panel handles it. The same system runs behind our developer API at portal.moltsearch.ai: nine endpoints, your own key, pay by credit.
The debate is our take on the “LLM Council” idea — a group of AI models that weigh in and settle on one answer. The concept was popularized by Andrej Karpathy. We made it real-time, hid the names so no model can favour itself, added a neutral judge that never answers the question, and a real agreement score — then shipped it as a product anyone can use.
Plans.
No account needed. Try a real debate before you sign up.
A three-model panel, judged the same way.
Six-model panels and premium model versions.
The full ten-model panel on frontier model versions.
Don’t take one AI’s word for it.
Ask the whole panel.
It’s free to try — two debates as a guest, no account and no card. Ask something that matters to you and see whether the AIs actually agree.